Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein Movie Review
Abbott and Costello had lost momentum—and even appeared in a couple of movies in which they didn't called Abbott And Costello Meet Frankenstein, in which the boys do battle with Frankenstein's monster DVD Review. Reviews; The Masters; Newsreel; About Us . CHIIIIIIIIICK!!), two package handlers in a Florida coastal town. All things considered, Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein is a triumph of genre-melding and one of the most-loved of A & C's. Product Description. ITEM: Original U.S. Half-sheet (22 x 28 inch) Movie Poster from the Have a question? Find answers in product info, Q&As, reviews.
Family and kid friendly Halloween movies are tough to come by today. Most Halloween movies are bloody, gory slasher style movies aimed mainly at a specific audience. The kid friendly movies that are out there today are hardly memorable. And while the star power of Lugosi and Cheney was the bigger part of what made the movie memorable, the family friendly comedy of Abbott and Costello didn't hurt either.
While audiences had seen their brand of comedy plenty of times before, it's the kind of comedy taht compared to today's comedy, will never get old. All of this in mind, Abbott and Costello meet Frankenstein may not be the best or most memorable of all the Halloween movies ever made. But it's one that families can watch together again and again every Halloween.
- Post navigation
- What is the Tomatometer®?
- Questions & Answers
When I was a kid they were the staple diet for my TV viewing. I wondered if they were as good as I remembered and if my kids would like it in today's modern age.
Abbot and Costello meet Frankeinstien is regarded as one of their better movies and I vaguely remember it from my childhood. Firstly let me sayLou Costello still makes me laugh. He made my kids laugh too which is a good thing. Sadly the film does not stand the test of time too well. The special affectswhile good in the 's don't impress now and the storyline drifts all over the place.
Here is what I believe I have learned about progress in our field from these and related experiences e. The science of doing consumer research has dramatically improved over the years: That, of course, is good news: At the same time, our field has fragmentedCin keeping with mature disciplinesCand so researchers often start their inquiries by zooming in on previously circumscribed relationships.
Understandable, perhaps unavoidable, but there is a risk of losing contact with the issues that spawned the research in the first place.
It might be appropriate to question whether the discipline has achieved the assumed degree of maturity. Perhaps we are largely kidding ourselves when, with minor variations, we do the same study which might have been done in a field that gave no consideration whatever to what consumers do and how they do it.
In other cases, researchers almost seem to have gone out of their way to find projects that are at best tangential to consumers' experiences and settings, as if to demonstrate greater vision and the value of creative self-expression.
Then too, our field has proven to be a particularly fertile ground for the research equivalent of "one-night stands" and what I shall call "peacock displays.
Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein – Once upon a screen…
The "grab them while they're hot" types of papers show an entrepreneurial talent for scooping other people when something that seems particularly clever appears in a respected discipline. Unfortunately, the researcher hasn't seemed to take the time to figure out what level of contribution, if any, is likely. So, once the scoop has occurred, it's back to keeping one's eyes and ears open for the next opportunity. The second type of one-night stand follows from reading a study carried out elsewhere and thinking, "I can do that.
Another line on the rTsumT. The opposite of "one-night stands" is programmatic research, of which not enough good things can possibly be said.ABBOT AND COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN (Exhumed Review)
All through the animal kingdom, species strut, dance, display prominent coloring and emit sounds in order to signal their special qualities to others. But we've really had too much of that over our twenty-five years. Okay, your paper demonstrated a reading acquaintance with ancient Sanskrit; or perhaps you have an uncanny ability to observe Jungian archetypes in your colleagues; or perhaps you are prepared to resist all logical arguments and empirical evidence that you do, in fact, exist.
If a mastery of Sanskrit or the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle would somehow be useful to our field, rather than substituting the trappings of knowledge for genuine insight, let's seek the depth of a real expert, someone who has made this their life's work. If you truly think some perspective, some approach, some research method has value in our quest to better understand consumer behavior, others are more likely to agree with you if you translate this conviction into a substantive contribution.
In today's vernacular, don't just "talk the talk, walk the walk. And it's a transparently self-serving basis for asking others to accept whatever opinion you woke up with today. I think it would be worthwhile for those seriously interested in the development of this field to think about how it has been evolving and where it might be headed.
To that end, let me return to what it is we hoped to learn about and contribute by coming together under the auspices of the Association for Consumer Research. We might ask, for example, "How have we done in understanding consumers' responses to various activities of the marketing system? As a start, however, my sense is that we have pretty much operationalized marketing variables and response contexts in ways that are much more convenient but which sacrifice essential elements of reality.
Some limitations are often duly noted but not addressed in follow-up studies. How about what I would term the "basic behavioral science orientation," which looked at consumer behavior as possibly the ideal "laboratory" for carrying out behavioral research?
Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein Review
Well, one problem here is that we have too often been content to settle for consumer behavior "cover stories" rather than submitting such theory to the more searching, severe examination that real-life dilemmas and settings would allow.
All too often, we do not clearly decide whether particular research is intended to: In the former case, we cannot sensibly avoid assessing conceptual relevance to the behavioral episode we are trying to understand. In the latter, we have an obligation, first, to act consistent with the recognition that all theories are naturally situated in particular contexts, and, second, to determine if particular behaviors of consumers would provide a meaningful opportunity for furthering understanding.
Accordingly, setting out to run a study as a "test" of a theory in an "up" or "down" sense is a quixotic enterprise. Instead, a series of studies should be seen as an opportunity to more fully explicate a theory's internal structure and the factors that qualify and moderate its role in a larger theoretical network. I do not believe that our discipline's report card on these fundamental research decisions is particularly impressive. I think few would disagree with a negative assessment of our field's efforts to describe the behaviors of consuming units and to evaluate system-wide performance.
Large-scale field projects are time-consuming and often costly, but even beyond that, there has not been much attention to the use of secondary data. A recent infusion of interest in rich, descriptive research might help remedy this state of affairs, but that depends largely on the criteria used to select behaviors for study.
To this point, I can see little to be overly optimistic about in that regard. Finally, mainstream consumer behavior researchers have tended to shy away from public policy issues unless these could be fairly closely wedded to traditional research paradigms. While this has allowed us to sidestep the burden of grappling with complex and subtle questions, our framing of such issues has tended to place our research on the periphery of meaningful public policy topics and discussions.
This brief overview of the field's performance against knowledge goals that were important to us when ACR was established was not presented as or meant to be an indictment of ACR. Professional associations tend to be responsive to the wishes of their members. The question then becomes, "To what degree should ACR explicitly adopt a leadership role and try to influence the type of research in the field?
Still, I will end this paper by making the point that I think it is important to take stock of where we have been and where we appear to be going. Classic Costello meets monster fare ensues. Whose brain do they intend to use? In order to put a stop to all the terrible plans, Talbot needs the help of Wilbur and Chick, all the while fighting his own demons and an ever-full moon. I must say poor Talbot, as far as monsters go, is quite the downer.
Anyway, I think you get the picture. His is always a character that is in the wrong place at the wrong time. There are plenty of scares and opportunities for the wonderful, classic repartee that made Abbott and Costello such a hit during the golden ages of three mediums of mass communications — radio, movies and television.
But having all these monsters around who not only want to get at Wilbur but also hate each other — the Wolf Man and Dracula in particular — lends itself to grand mayhem and several frights as well whereby Wilbur and Chick run into a classic monster in every room of the castle.
One has to love the apparent demise of Dracula as well — trying to escape the pursuing Wolf Man, the Count starts to turn into a bat then out comes the Wolf Man, grabs a hold of the animal before it flies away and they both fall into the rocks and crashing waves below. Meanwhile, The Monster continues his relentless pursuit of Wilbur and Chip who do all they can, in hilarious fashion, to evade being killed by the creature.
He chases them out of castle where he meets his demise in an ending that rivals the best climax in any of the classic Universal horrors. Then just before the film ends, as the boys are trying to escape in a little boat, another monster appears.
A must mention — the gorgeous, classic horror film score by Frank Skinner in this film. From the moment the Universal logo appears and that first, loud, distinctive note plays I want to run for cover — it evokes such wonderful thrills. I might add that animation is also used beautifully in the scenes where Dracula turns into a bat. Particularly interesting are the stories concerning the actors who play the famous monsters but, in truth, everything about the making of this film fascinates me.
The transition scenes where Talbot Chaney turn into the monster are really great in this film too — the editing is less clumsy, for lack of a better word, than in the version.